Dale Bruner and Adam Neder embody the mission of Laity Lodge by making complex things simple
Itโs an overcast Friday on the first morning of what will likely be the last-ever Laity Lodge retreat to feature theologian Dr.ย Daleย Bruner as a guest speaker. Bruner stands at the front of the Great Hall and fills a large white board with a series of playful stick figures meant to elucidate elements of Jesusโ teaching in the Sermon on the Mount and what Jesus was trying to tell us about power, peacemaking, andย more.
Bruner walks back and forth in front of a Great Hall brimming with Lodge guests, reading from the Scriptures, gesturing toward the white board, cracking wise here and there, and calling out some version of โIs this making sense?โ over and overย again.
This is Dale Bruner in his elementโteaching the Bible by breaking it down into available, relevant, understandable parts. Heโs been doing it for most of his 87 yearsโas a missionary in the Philippines, a professor of theology at Whitworth University in Spokane, Washington, andโperhaps most importantly to himโas a weekly Sunday School teacher at his local Presbyterian church, whether in Spokane or, since his 1997 retirement, in Losย Angeles.
Heโs also been doing it at Laity Lodge since the 1980s. Bruner canโt recall how many times heโs come to teach. His guessโโ20?โโis conservative. And if this really is his last time, itโs only because travel is tough, time is more precious, and he needs to stay close to home for next weekโs Sundayย School.
Fortunately, Brunerโs legacy has legs. This weekend, Bruner has a co-speaker in one Dr. Adam Neder, who is helping him (and all the Lodge guests) tackle the eponymous question of the retreat: โWhoย Isย Jesus?โ
Itโs a fitting pairing: Neder also teaches at Whitworth, where he holds the Bruner-Welch Chair in Theology. That chair was established in 2006 by Bill Welch, a businessman from Tulsa who was inspired by Brunerโs particular approach to Christian teachingโnamely, one that offers academically rigorous scholarship that is accessible, engaging, and helpful to the church and the wider world, as Neder describesย it.
โ[Brunerโs scholarship] was every bit as serious and excellent as any academic,โ says Neder. โFriends who are pastors have told me that Daleโs commentary on Matthew is the single best commentary on any book of the Bible theyโve read to help pastors prepare sermons. And itโs also really respected in the academicย community.โ
The chair was established to allow a scholar to carry on Brunerโs legacy in a practical way. Every fall and January session, Neder teaches a regular course load. But from February until the following fall, heโs meant to be โdoing work that would benefit the church and the world and the academyโโwriting and speaking, crafting his research and reflections into lessons that can reach a wider audience.
Forty-odd years separate the men, and their pedagogical styles are not the same. Where Bruner prowls the platform, Neder steadies himself behind the lectern. Where Bruner draws cartoons, Neder passes out lists of questions for interactive discussion.
Watching Neder teach in the wake of Bruner in the Great Hall, you can see why Neder sits in Brunerโs chair. But the same spirit hovers over both teachers: the spirit of teaching, breaking things down, helping us understand.
On this morning, Neder describes teaching the history of theology to the young students at Whitworth today, and watching their eyes glaze over. โI had to get them to think about Jesusโ in all the surprising ways that the church fathers thought about Jesus, to address all the questions early church theology addresses about the nature of Jesus.
So he came up with a list of questions for them to answer. Questions like:
If LeBron James stepped into a time machine, traveled back to the year 30 AD, and played Jesus in a game of one-on-one basketball, who do you think would have won? And why?
Or:
What does Jesus look like? (Not what did he look like, but what does he look like?)
Or:
Is Jesus still a human being? If so, where is he?
These questions may seem silly. But if you think about them seriously and begin to talk about them with others, you realize what Neder has doneโinspired you to get behind all your assumptions about Jesus and consider the building blocks of your theology. Before you know it, youโre doing the same thought work that the early church fathers did. On that retreat weekend, for a few minutes, the Great Hall was something like a scene from the Council of Nicea.
โWho is Jesus?โ is a simple question. Itโs also an endlessly complex question, one that will never finish being answered (well, almost never). Taking it, considering it, opening it up and seeing all it has to offerโthis is the work of good teachers who care about talking to the people.
โThe temptation to elitism,โ says Neder, โhas always been with us: We belong, and you donโt, and we help you see that by using language you donโt understand.โ Bruner and Neder are models of resisting that temptation, and of how to turn spiritual things into a conversation that is for all of usโthe laity.
If LeBron James stepped into a time machine, traveled back to the year 30 AD, and played Jesus in a game of one-on-one basketball, who do you think would have won? And why?